In his book “Ownership,” Sean McGever recounts the historical actions and perspectives of John Wesley, Jonathan Edwards, and George Whitefield regarding slavery. A notable point of contention was whether slaves should be taught about Jesus. Many Christian slaveholders were reluctant to evangelize their slaves, fearing it would obligate them to grant freedom to their own slaves, leading to a loss of labor. Consequently, many withheld the gospel from their slaves, believing their salvation would come at a personal cost. This prioritization of self-interest over the spiritual well-being of slaves directly contradicts Jesus’ teaching to “do unto others as you would have them do unto you” and Paul's admonition to "Do nothing our of selfish ambition or vain conceit. Rather, in humility value others above yourselves, not looking to you own interstes but each of you to the interests of the others."
History often echoes itself, and I believe this pattern is evident in our churches today concerning the LGBTQ+ community. Some believe that maintaining personal and corporate holiness is paramount, even if it means sacrificing the opportunity for the LGBTQ+ community to know Jesus. The high value placed on holiness leads some to distance themselves from what they deem unholy or sinful. This stance results in the exclusion of the LGBTQ+ community from businesses and opposition to legislation that would grant them rights, further alienating them from the church.
What if, instead, we prioritized bringing Jesus to the LGBTQ+ community? This would require us to build relationships with them, replacing shame with empathy, and demonstrating love in a way that is recognizable and meaningful. While we must uphold holiness, it should not come at the expense of others. We are called to holiness AND to consider the well-being of the LGBTQ+ community, showing them the love of Jesus authentically and compassionately.

